SuperCoach Scores Twitter SuperCoach Scores Facebook
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 45 of 45
  1. #41
    Dual Best & Fairest
    Join Date: 18-06-2012
    AFL Club: Melbourne
    Posts: 3,216
    Likes: 1,064
    Rep Power: 4030


    0 Not allowed!

    I only saw the first half. Danger actually looked very dangerous in the first quarter and I remember thinking oh no here we go again.

    I think its a bit early for making hasty decisions. We pick premiums for a reason and there is no point crying over spilt milk.

    Given Adelaide's soft early draw, as others have said he is just as likely to score 150+ next week.
    SuperCoach:  2263 (2017)  8447 (2016)  292 (2015)  3718 (2014)  3958 (2013)  731 (2012) 


  2. #42
    Rising Star Winner
    Join Date: 20-04-2012
    AFL Club: Essendon
    Posts: 276
    Likes: 201
    Rep Power: 1247


    0 Not allowed!

    Quote Originally Posted by Philzsay View Post
    The one positive for those with Danger is that Round 1 is probably one of the best rounds to have a low score as the score only features in one price change as opposed to three weeks of price changes.
    That's a really good point Phil.

    Crows only laid 7 tackles in the 3rd quarter, shows an overall lack of physical intensity, including bumps, blocks and shepherds - all things that would help Danger do his thing.

    After that effort last night, and with Brisbane, Port and Bulldogs to come in the next 3 rounds, I would expect Danger and the Crows to bounce back with a BANG!
    SuperCoach:  1640 (2016)  8215 (2015)  10,800 (2014) 


  3. #43
    Rising Star Nominee
    Join Date: 10-04-2012
    AFL Club: Richmond
    Posts: 89
    Likes: 9
    Rep Power: 690


    0 Not allowed!

    Interesting article. This may scare off a few Abletteers.
    http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-03-1...ore-for-ablett
    Question is if he kicks goals it won't make his scores less. But lower game time is interesting.

    I tended this year to avoid most expensive players as they usually flatten out a bit by the time your ready to upgrade a rookie. Just in the mids though. I picked Goddard and Cox. Cox in the FWD not ruck. I have the Roughy/Cox/Rowe Ruck/Fwd combo a few will do this year.
    There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know.
    There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know.
    But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know.

    Donald Rumsfeld.

  4. #44
    All Australian Player
    Join Date: 29-03-2012
    AFL Club: Geelong
    Posts: 8,668
    Likes: 1,139
    Rep Power: 3531


    0 Not allowed!

    Quote Originally Posted by feralmong View Post
    Interesting article. This may scare off a few Abletteers.
    http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-03-1...ore-for-ablett
    Question is if he kicks goals it won't make his scores less. But lower game time is interesting.

    I tended this year to avoid most expensive players as they usually flatten out a bit by the time your ready to upgrade a rookie. Just in the mids though. I picked Goddard and Cox. Cox in the FWD not ruck. I have the Roughy/Cox/Rowe Ruck/Fwd combo a few will do this year.
    Thanks for this.

    I've taken Gazza out. =/ Hopefully it is a good decision.
    SuperCoach:  11,230 (2016)  13,984 (2015)  54,528 (2014)  4,502 (2013)  9,020 (2012)  927 (2011)  ~5,000 (2010) 

    Co-Founder and CEO of the 2014 SCDL (SuperCoach Draft League) - Division's 1 and 2.

  5. #45
    Draftee
    Join Date: 08-01-2013
    Posts: 18
    Likes: 0
    Rep Power: 118


    0 Not allowed!

    Dose this mean Ablett's a Mid/Fwd next year. I don't believe this year being McKenna last chance with GC, that'll he'll have his best ball winner sitting in the forward line for too long a stints, and if GAJ now going to kick more goals, why wouldn't you have him in your team. They need Ablett bringing the ball to the Forward.
      Quote Quote

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •